Art of Leadership

In the Santa Cruz mountains, they would say: “Ben Zander is full of awesome”.

Ben Zander is famous conductor.  I have to admit, I did not know he also writes books. Not until we went to a book store, where my wife found  little yellow book, called “The Art of Possibility” by Ben and Rosamund Zander.

“I have to read this. Ben Zander is a great writer”, she said.

Ben Zander is great conductor. And a great writer. And a great teacher.  The little yellow book has changed the way I tell people what has to be done.

Ben starts by telling, that “everything” is “invented.” Our perception is subjective, and, in some form, “invented.” By changing the perception, we can change our reactions and our actions, this is the preach.

As experienced teacher, Ben sets a homework – exercises for changing our perception. These are not easy, not at all. These excercizes work, though. Slowly, more and more possibilities unfold.

As the rule of 10,000 tells us,  it would take 10,000 exercises to master this kind of emotion control. Ben does not leave us at this kind of emotion control, but rather goes on and explains, how a leader can unfold possibilities to these whom he leads.

I really glad my wife gave me this book.


Reflecting on the poor performance on Saturday

The reason behind my poor performance was more mental than physical. I crashed by pushing the envelope too much, which was caused by anxiety, which was caused by lack of confidence.

Next race I will stick to the game plan and will

Dr. Cohn writes in his article on mental abilities for motocross racers about mental tune-up before the race.  He highlights the following points to cover:

  • confidence
  • focus
  • ability to perform naturally and instinctively
  • relax and try less when you want to win badly
  • handle errors
  • mental prep

While these suggestions are more for a motocross racer, I find all of these very important for XC racing.

Sour race at CCCX #8

5/30, really bad race day. I arrived to the race venue slightly late. After registration I started warmup with a few little sprints on pavement, then moved on to the singletrack. Lots of sand, and really fast course.

Standing in line before the start, I stretched legs, did a few squats and made sure the bike is in right gear for the fast start.  Juniors started at 9.03, we went off one minute later.

Just before the singletrack I was 4th in position, but I sprinted into 2nd. Then we started gaining speed, passing slow Juniors. The course was flat, I was not working too hard, remembering to pace myself. The first 5 miles the race went rather well. I followed Wade from the team, and this was fun.

Then I overbaked a turn, and fell really hard on my right hip.  After a few minutes of pain and misery, I crawled back to the bike, and started pedalling. I was passed by almost everyone, except for the slowest Juniors. I was actually riding  with left leg only, the right leg refused to act.

At the lap I was asked whether I need a medic. I said “yes”, then I thought  and said, “no, dammit, I am going on for 2 laps.” Well, maybe thinking was not involved there.

The second was horribly painful, but I sort of passed a few kids and women 🙂 At the lap gate I decided to go for another lap.

Then my bike decided that I need a rest. The next thing I knew was that I was standing in a side of a trail, trying to pull the chain out of the rear wheel. Somehow the chain has been pushed in between the cassette and the hub flange, twisted ninety degrees and stuck there. After five minutes of trying to pull the chain the old way, I unfastened the chain (yay to PowerLinks) to two parts, pulled as hard as I can while standing on the frame, and bingo – the chain was free. I fastened the chain into whole (yay again to PowerLinks),  and resumed the race.

The universe was made of pain.

When I was closing to the lap, I heard some people talking behind my back. I was sure these were faster riders that lapped me, so I pulled to the side.

– “Are you racing? You are so slow…” one of those riders asked.

– “Yes” I muttered,

– “Don’t pay attention to us, go ahead! This is the last climb, it’s all downhill from here! Relax, and push” – the rider cheered me.

Push push push push push, damn.  When I passed the lap gate, I almost fell from the bike.

That was one painful race.

The Grand Unified Theorem of Reverse Engineering

The Grand Unified Theorem of Software Engineering is not a theorem, actually. It’s a joke, with a grain of truth in it. It states that “You can solve every problem with another level of abstraction, except for the problem of too many levels of abstraction.” 

The Grand Unified Theorem of Reverse Engineering is not a theorem either. This joke refers to the above mock theorem, by stating that “You can find answer to any question by breaking another level of abstraction, except for the problem of having no useable abstraction to start with”

Some would say that the former refers to Math, while the latter refers to Science. Some other would say exactly the opposite.

Yosemite Half Dome at sunset

My daily job includes a fair share of researching implementations of ad-hoc defined network protocols. This process is tedious and sometimes frustrating, yet sometimes it brings its “Aha!” moments. Sometimes I like to compare reverse engineering with hiking in the mountains. Lots of striding in even pace, intermixed with moments of excitement. Just like the natural wonders protect themselves from visitors by steep trails and annoying weather, so do software designs hide behind mundane details. Just like in hiking, the excitement of seeing the monolith of architecture, when it reveals itself, ,  

Modern computer architectures make learning protocols both easier and harder. Java, Python or .NET programs have very rich runtime environment, which brings structure and metainformation to start with. On the other hand, “native” or “unmanaged” code do not have the same structure? or has it? 

While working with native code, it’s very imporatant to undestand the assumptions that were taken when the code was written. Is the code multi-platform? In this case, chances are the software was written in the “stratified” way: specifics of different platforms are abstracted out into common APIs. Is the code network specific? In this case, probably it will use Berkeley Sockets API or its equivalent. 

Short list of tools I have to use routinely:

  • Wireshark, the protocol analyzer
  • IDA Pro, the interactive disassembler 
  • dumpbin, which is actually a binary process visualizer
  • VMWare, which is a great way to set up an environment

Some other tools I use infrequently:

  • SCAPY, the interactive network protocol client
  • OllyDbg, the debugger

In general, the process of reversing application consists of trial and error, in understanding the processes and implementation.  This is where VMWare Snapshots become very useful feature. 

Ilfak Guilfanov, the author of IDA interactive disassembler, has a blog:

Unicode Byte Order Detection

Once in a while I run into the following problem: give a stream of bytes, which are know to represent Unicode characters, what is the correct byte order?

Assuming that the Unicode byte stream is valid Unicode stream, we can clearly see that if character Ci is in certain byte order, then the next character, Ci+1 will be in same encoding as well, unless a byte order mark (BOM) specifies the byte order for following bytes.  Moreover, assuming the Unicode byte stream represents character stream, there’s certain probability that adjacent characters belong to same word.

Same words are usually written in same language, which implies same Unicode code page. In other words: in human text, number of different code pages will be low.

This is important property, which we are going to exploit.

This number of different code pages clearly depends on the document: for a math text in English, some words will be in English, some in Greek and some will be special symbols. On the other hand, a biology text in Romanian will include Romanian words intermixed with biology terms in Latin (probably, in italic).

The location of codepage bytes is governed by the byte order used by the Unicode byte stream. By determining, which bytes are used for codepages, we can detect the byte order. 

The algorithm is easy:

  1. take a sampling buffer, _buf  from the stream. The size of _buf should be sufficiently large for detection, but not too large so to slow the algorithm down. 64 bytes sounds like a good guess.
  2. For a first pass: 
    1. Allocate 2 hash sets: LO_BYTE and HI_BYTE
    2. Iterate over the _buf in 2 byte offset increments (stored in offset). Insert _buf[offset] to HI_BYTE and _buf[offset+1] to LO_BYTE 
  3. For a second pass:
    1. Allocate 2 hash sets: LO_NIBBLE and HI_NIBBLE
    2. Iterate over the _buf in 4 byte offset offset. Insert (_buf[offset]&0xFF)<<8|_buf[offset+1]&0xFF to HI_NIBBLE and _buf[offset+2]&0xFF)<<8|_buf[offset+3]&0xFF to LO_NIBBLE 
  4. Chose the hash set best with lowest number of different entries nbest.
    1. if nbest > EXPECTED_NUMBER_OF_LANGUAGES  probably the encoding is UTF8
    2. otherwise, if best is LO_BYTE, the encoding is UTF-16LE 
    3. otherwise, if best is HI_BYTE, the encoding is UTF-16BE
    4. otherwise, if best is HI_NIBBLE, the encoding is UTF-32BE
    5. otherwise, if best is LO_NIBBLE, the encoding is UTF-32LE
    6. otherwise, check your implementation, it probably contains a bug.

Of course, if the BOM (byte order mark) is present, the whole issue of detecting the encoding becomes moot.

Sea Otter Classic

This weekend I competed at Sea Otter Classic Cross Country race.

I did not have the time to pre-ride the course. This was too bad, because there were lots of sections I held down speed, just becase I was not sure what’s coming next.   Before the race I did 35 minute warmup, which did wonders to my legs. 

The course was sandy, with numerous sections of foot deep sand. 48039-164-007f

We started at the Laguna Seca motor-racing track, where the whole field just accelerated up.  It was great fun just being in a wave of 50 riders, swaying from side to side as the track turned.

I was feeling good on climbs, although was constantly bugged by a mechanical – my chain kept sliding between the cassette and the spokes. I had to stop 5 times to pull the chain out, losing a few minutes in total. 

In the beginning I tried to see how aggressively I can corner, and apparently I can corner with more gusto than technique. After the first crash, I decided to stay within the “safe” limits. 

Another crash happened on the “technical descent section” where I was totally scared by the ruts.

After these two, I rode rather steadily.

Sea Otter Classic

Sea Otter Classic starts soon. This would be my first time racing XC on the SOC course, although I did the SuperD last year.

Today I have started tapering, after another painful strength exercise lesson in Integrate Performance Fitness studio.

My previous races this season yilded mixed results. On the last race, I had a flu, I crashed and I DFLed. On the the one before, I was strong and got to the podium.

My goal is to finish within 2 hours, pace myself and be strong on the final climb.